Efficacy of laser treatment for onychomycotic nails: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

Kelvin Yeung, Vinzent Kevin Ortner, Torben Martinussen, Uwe Paasch, Merete Haedersdal

Abstract

Laser therapy for onychomycosis is emerging but its efficacy remains unestablished. To examine current evidence on efficacy of laser treatment of onychomycosis. A systematic review and one-arm meta-analysis, including all prospective clinical trials, identified on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. Trials with participants as unit of analysis (UOA), n = 13, were analyzed separately from trials with nails as UOA, n = 7. Summary proportions and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Outcomes were mycological cure, clinical improvement, or complete cure. Twenty-two prospective trials (four randomized controlled trials and 18 uncontrolled trials) with a total of 755 participants were analyzed. Summary proportions with 95% CI for participants as UOA were mycological cure 70.4%, 95% CI 52.2-83.8%; clinical improvement 67.2%, 95% CI 43.2-84.7%; and complete cure 7.2%, 95% CI 1.9-23.5%. High statistical heterogeneity was detected (mycological cure I2 = 88%, P < 0.01; clinical improvement I2 = 69%, P < 0.01; complete cure I2 = 60%, P = 0.11). The current level of evidence is limited and with high heterogeneity, making it difficult to assess the true efficacy of laser treatment for onychomycosis. Larger randomized controlled trials with well-defined methodology are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLasers in Medical Science
Volume34
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1513-1525
Number of pages13
ISSN0268-8921
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Laser Therapy
  • Nails/pathology
  • Onychomycosis/surgery
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of laser treatment for onychomycotic nails: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this