Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Effects of using the simplified airway risk index vs usual airway assessment on unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation - a cluster randomized trial with 64,273 participants

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. Lactate versus acetate buffered intravenous crystalloid solutions: a scoping review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. Reply to Br J Anaesth 2020; 124: 739-47

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  3. Tracheal intubation in traumatic brain injury: a multicentre prospective observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Minimising droplet and virus spread during and after tracheal extubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  5. Enhanced recovery after surgery components and perioperative outcomes: a nationwide observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Unanticipated difficult intubation remains a challenge in anaesthesia. The Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI) is a multivariable risk model consisting of seven independent risk factors for difficult intubation. Our aim was to compare preoperative airway assessment based on the SARI with usual airway assessment.

METHODS: From 01.10.2012 to 31.12.2013, 28 departments were cluster-randomized to apply the SARI model or usual airway assessment. The SARI group implemented the SARI model. The Non-SARI group continued usual airway assessment, thus reflecting a group of anaesthetists' heterogeneous individual airway assessments. Preoperative prediction of difficult intubation and actual intubation difficulties were registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database for both groups. Patients who were preoperatively scheduled for intubation by advanced techniques (e.g. video laryngoscopy; flexible optic scope) were excluded from the primary analysis. Primary outcomes were the proportions of unanticipated difficult and unanticipated easy intubation.

RESULTS: A total of 26 departments (15 SARI and 11 Non-SARI) and 64 273 participants were included. In the primary analyses 29 209 SARI and 30 305 Non-SARI participants were included.In SARI departments 2.4% (696) of the participants had an unanticipated difficult intubation vs 2.4% (723) in Non-SARI departments. Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for design variables was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.77-1.38). The proportion of unanticipated easy intubation was 1.42% (415) in SARI departments vs 1.00% (302) in Non-SARI departments. Adjusted OR was 1.26 (0.68-2.34).

CONCLUSIONS: Using the SARI compared with usual airway assessment we detected no statistical significant changes in unanticipated difficult- or easy intubations.


Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)680-9
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

ID: 46399967