Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of oncolytic immunotherapy with RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) on immune cells mediate responsiveness to anti-PD-1 via STING-mediated interferon signaling

Victoria Roulstone, Joan Kyula, Elizabeth Appleton, Praveen K Bommareddy, Anton Patrikeev, Sylwia Jones, Linta Kuncheria, Charleen Ml Chan Wah Hak, Shane Foo, Holly Baldock, Amarin Wongariyapak, Isla Leslie, Robert Pickering, Christian Zierhut, Henry G Smith, Nitya Mohan, Carmen Murano, Lisa C Hubbard, Isaac Dean, Emmanuel Christian PatinJim Gkantalis, David Mansfield, Malin Pedersen, Martin McLaughlin, Maria Goicoechea, Scott Layzell, Jonathan Mannion, Winnie Fernando, Pascal Meier, Richard Vile, Alan Melcher, Robert S Coffin, Kevin J Harrington

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antitumor immune responses induced by oncolytic immunotherapy (OI) are often followed by upregulation of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). As such, the combination of OI with blockade of the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 axis has demonstrated therapeutic activity in preclinical and clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to understand further the immune-mediated mechanism of interaction between oncolytic viruses and anti-PD-1 therapy.

METHODS: Tumor cells and immune cells (splenocytes) were cultured separately, or in co-culture with vusolimogene oderparepvec, an oncolytic herpes simplex virus expressing the fusogenic gibbon-ape leukemia virus-fusogenic membrane glycoprotein protein (GALV) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), also known as RP1. Viral replication, interferon (IFN) responses and PD-L1 expression were analyzed using wild-type, IFNAR1, TNFAR1 and STING knockout splenocytes. In vivo studies evaluated immune cell infiltrates into the tumor following RP1 administration with anti-PD-1 therapy.

RESULTS: RP1 replication was evident in tumor cells but not splenocytes. This was also accompanied by upregulated IFN expression in cultured splenocytes that was absent in cultured tumor cells. However, when these cell types were co-cultured, splenocytes mediated an interferon response to RP1 via STING that was transmitted to tumor cells in a non-touch-dependent manner. Tumor cells responded to these input signals via upregulation of cell surface major histocompatibility complex-I and PD-L1 through tumor intrinsic JAK-STAT signaling. In vivo, an IFN signature was observed following intratumoral injection of RP1, both in injected and non-injected tumors, which was further increased when combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Marked upregulation of PD-L1 was observed in tumors injected with RP1 accompanied by the recruitment of CD11b+Ly6G+neutrophils into the tumor microenvironment, which stained positive for PD-L1.

CONCLUSION: Overall, the data demonstrate that RP1 remodels the tumor microenvironment through a combination of direct and indirect effects on both tumor and immune cells, resulting in an overall more inflamed phenotype.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Volume14
Issue number3
ISSN2051-1426
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Combination therapy
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor
  • JAK-STAT
  • Neutrophil
  • Virology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of oncolytic immunotherapy with RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) on immune cells mediate responsiveness to anti-PD-1 via STING-mediated interferon signaling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this