Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Effects of avoidance or use of neuromuscular blocking agents on outcomes in tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Lactate versus acetate buffered intravenous crystalloid solutions: a scoping review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. Reply to Br J Anaesth 2020; 124: 739-47

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  3. Tracheal intubation in traumatic brain injury: a multicentre prospective observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Minimising droplet and virus spread during and after tracheal extubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  5. Enhanced recovery after surgery components and perioperative outcomes: a nationwide observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The Agents Intervening against Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit-Trial (AID-ICU trial):- a detailed statistical analysis plan

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Long-term mortality in the Intermediate care after emergency abdominal surgery (InCare) trial - a post-hoc follow-up study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Minimising droplet and virus spread during and after tracheal extubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Cohort studies have indicated that avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) is a risk factor for difficult tracheal intubation. However, the impact of avoiding NMBA on tracheal intubation, possible adverse effects, and postoperative discomfort has not been evaluated in a systematic review of randomised trials. We searched several databases for trials published until January 2017. We included randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of avoiding vs using NMBA. Two independent authors assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The risk of random errors was assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). We included 34 trials (3565 participants). In the four trials judged to have low risk of bias, there was an increased risk of difficult tracheal intubation with no use of NMBA [random-effects model, risk ratio (RR) 13.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.19-21.49, P<0.00001, TSA-adjusted CI 1.85-95.04]. The result was confirmed when including all trials, (RR 5.00, 95% CI 3.49-7.15, P<0.00001, TSA-adjusted CI 1.20-20.77). There was a significant risk of upper airway discomfort or injury by avoiding NMBA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.74, P=0.008, TSA-adjusted CI 1.00-1.86). None of the trials reported mortality. Avoiding NMBA was significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopy, (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.53-4.21, P=0.0003, TSA-adjusted CI 0.27-21.75). In a clinical context, one must balance arguments for using NMBA when performing tracheal intubation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume120
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1381-1393
Number of pages13
ISSN0007-0912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

ID: 54150392