Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Effect Modifiers and Statistical Tests for Interaction in Randomized Trials

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Validation studies in epidemiologic research: Estimation of the positive predictive value

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Statistical analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yield a causally valid estimate of the overall treatment effect, which is the contrast between the outcomes in two randomized treatment groups commonly accompanied by a confidence interval. In addition, the trial investigators may want to examine whether the observed treatment effect varies across patient subgroups (also called 'heterogeneity of treatment effects'), i.e. whether the treatment effect is modified by the value of a variable assessed at baseline. The statistical approach for this evaluation of potential effect modifiers is a test for statistical interaction to evaluate whether the treatment effect varies across levels of the effect modifier. In this article, we provide a concise and nontechnical explanation of the use of simple statistical tests for interaction to identify effect modifiers in RCTs. We explain how to calculate the test of interaction by hand, applied to a dataset with simulated data on 1,000 imaginary participants for illustration.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume134
Pages (from-to)174-177
Number of pages4
ISSN0895-4356
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

ID: 65748348