Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Noninvasive respiratory support in the hypoxaemic peri-operative/periprocedural patient: a joint ESA/ESICM guideline

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Oxygen toxicity in major emergency surgery-anything new?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Expert statement on the ICU management of patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.

RESULTS: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI -5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume43
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1637-1647
Number of pages11
ISSN0342-4642
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52790237