Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

EANM perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. RADIATION PROTECTION OF LINAC BUNKERS. A USER-FRIENDLY APPROACH

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Effect of altitude on solar UVR and spectral and spatial variations of UV irradiances measured inWagrain, Austria in winter

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Radiation exposure for medical staff performing quantitative coronary perfusion PET with 13N-ammonia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Ruptured human Achilles tendon has elevated metabolic activity up to 1 year after repair

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Somatosensory input and oromandibular dystonia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
Two scientific committees (physics & dosimetry) of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) commented on the draft 'Radiation Protection 162: radiation criteria for acceptability of radiological equipment used in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy' (RP 162). This document updates and extends the acceptability criteria mentioned in 'Radiation Protection 91' and is an important means to further improve the quality of medical procedures involving ionising radiation. While the EANM committees support the presented framework as described in the introductory chapter, they have suggested substantial changes to the specific suspension levels for nuclear medicine equipment. During the revision process, an agreed consensus position was reached. The EANM considers RP 162 a significant improvement of RP 91 and endorses the document.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume153
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)166-9
Number of pages4
ISSN0144-8420
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

ID: 36851640