Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Dynamic weight-bearing assessment of pain in knee osteoarthritis: a reliability and agreement study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. What to expect after open heart valve surgery? Changes in health-related quality of life

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Association between Type D personality and outcomes in patients with non-ischemic heart failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Strategies to improve patient-reported outcome completion rates in longitudinal studies

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Eculizumab improves fatigue in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change in a measurement instrument for pain and function in knee osteoarthritis; the Dynamic weight-bearing Assessment of Pain (DAP).

METHODS: The sample size was set to 20 persons, recruited from the outpatient osteoarthritis clinic at Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen. Two physiotherapists tested all participants during two visits; at the first visit, one single DAP (including four scores) was conducted by rater one; at the second visit, DAP was conducted by both raters one and two in randomized order with concealed allocation. The time interval was approximately 1.5 h. Measurement error was estimated by standard error of measurement (SEM). The intra- and inter-rater reliability was estimated by Intra-class Correlation Coefficients for agreement based on a two-way ANOVA with random effects (single measures ICC 2.1). Smallest detectable change (SDC) and limits of agreement were calculated.

RESULTS: The pain score showed excellent reliability in terms of ICC (intra-rater 0.93, CI 0.83-0.97, inter-rater 0.91, CI 0.78-0.96), low SEM (intra-rater 0.70, inter-rater 0.86, on a scale from 0 to 10), and acceptable SDC for intra-rater test (1.95). The three knee bend scores all had ICC above 0.50, showing fair-to-good reliability. None of the knee bend scores showed acceptable SEM and SDC.

CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of the DAP pain score meets the demands for use in clinical practice and research. The total knee bend could be useful for motivational purpose in clinical use. Testing of other psychometric properties of the DAP is pending.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
Volume24
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)2985-92
Number of pages8
ISSN0962-9343
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

ID: 45839114