Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Doxorubicin plus evofosfamide versus doxorubicin alone in locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (TH CR-406/SARC021): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. In vitro 4-1BB stimulation promotes expansion of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from various sarcoma subtypes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Improved Survival of Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with leiomyosarcoma: subgroup analysis from a phase 3, open-label, randomised study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • William D Tap
  • Zsuzsanna Papai
  • Brian A Van Tine
  • Steven Attia
  • Kristen N Ganjoo
  • Robin L Jones
  • Scott Schuetze
  • Damon Reed
  • Sant P Chawla
  • Richard F Riedel
  • Anders Krarup-Hansen
  • Maud Toulmonde
  • Isabelle Ray-Coquard
  • Peter Hohenberger
  • Giovanni Grignani
  • Lee D Cranmer
  • Scott Okuno
  • Mark Agulnik
  • William Read
  • Christopher W Ryan
  • Thierry Alcindor
  • Xavier F Garcia Del Muro
  • G Thomas Budd
  • Hussein Tawbi
  • Tillman Pearce
  • Stew Kroll
  • Denise K Reinke
  • Patrick Schöffski
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Evofosfamide is a hypoxia-activated prodrug of bromo-isophosphoramide mustard. We aimed to assess the benefit of adding evofosfamide to doxorubicin as first-line therapy for advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.

METHODS: We did this international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial (TH CR-406/SARC021) at 81 academic or community investigational sites in 13 countries. Eligible patients were aged 15 years or older with a diagnosis of an advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma, of intermediate or high grade, for which no standard curative therapy was available, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive doxorubicin alone (75 mg/m2 via bolus injection administered over 5-20 min or continuous intravenous infusion for 6-96 h on day 1 of every 21-day cycle for up to six cycles) or doxorubicin (given via the same dose procedure) plus evofosfamide (300 mg/m2 intravenously for 30-60 min on days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle for up to six cycles). After six cycles of treatment, patients in the single-drug doxorubicin group were followed up expectantly whereas patients with stable or responsive disease in the combination group were allowed to continue with evofosfamide monotherapy until documented disease progression. A web-based central randomisation with block sizes of two and four was stratified by extent of disease, doxorubicin administration method, and previous systemic therapy. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received any amount of study drug. This study was registered with, number NCT01440088.

FINDINGS: Between Sept 26, 2011, and Jan 22, 2014, 640 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (317 to doxorubicin plus evofosfamide and 323 to doxorubicin alone), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The overall survival endpoint was not reached (hazard ratio 1·06, 95% CI 0·88-1·29; p=0·527), with a median overall survival of 18·4 months (95% CI 15·6-22·1) with doxorubicin plus evofosfamide versus 19·0 months (16·2-22·4) with doxorubicin alone. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in both groups were haematological, including anaemia (150 [48%] of 313 patients in the doxorubicin plus evofosfamide group vs 65 [21%] of 308 in the doxorubicin group), neutropenia (47 [15%] vs 92 [30%]), febrile neutropenia (57 [18%] vs 34 [11%]), leucopenia (22 [7%] vs 17 [6%]), decreased neutrophil count (31 [10%] vs 41 [13%]), and decreased white blood cell count (39 [13%] vs 33 [11%]). Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was more common in the combination group (45 [14%]) than in the doxorubicin alone group (four [1%]), as was grade 3-4 stomatitis (26 [8%] vs seven [2%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 145 (46%) of 313 patients in the combination group and 99 (32%) of 308 in the doxorubicin alone group. Five (2%) patients died from treatment-related causes in the combination group (sepsis [n=2], septic shock [n=1], congestive cardiac failure [n=1], and unknown cause [n=1]) versus one (<1%) patient in the doxorubicin alone group (lactic acidosis [n=1]).

INTERPRETATION: The addition of evofosfamide to doxorubicin as first-line therapy did not improve overall survival compared with single-drug doxorubicin in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas and so this combination cannot be recommended in this setting.

FUNDING: Threshold Pharmaceuticals.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLancet Oncology
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1089-1103
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

    Research areas

  • Aged, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Disease-Free Survival, Doxorubicin, Drug Eruptions, Exanthema, Female, Hematologic Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitroimidazoles, Phosphoramide Mustards, Sarcoma, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Stomatitis, Survival Rate, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial

ID: 52666100