Dose-dependent teratogenicity of valproate in mono- and polytherapy: An observational study

Torbjörn Tomson, Dina Battino, Erminio Bonizzoni, John Craig, Dick Lindhout, Emilio Perucca, Anne Sabers, Sanjeev V Thomas, Frank Vajda, EURAP Study Group

133 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in association with maternal use of valproic acid (VPA) in monotherapy or adjunctive therapy, and its relationship with dose.

METHODS: The analysis was based on prospectively acquired data from EURAP, a registry enrolling women treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in early pregnancy, in which the primary outcome is presence of MCMs at 1 year after birth. Exposure was defined as type and dose of AEDs at time of conception. A comparison was made among 3 exposure types: (1) VPA monotherapy (n = 1,224); (2) VPA combined with lamotrigine (LTG) (n = 159); and (3) VPA combined with another AED but not LTG (n = 205).

RESULTS: The frequency of MCMs at 1 year after birth was 10.0% for VPA monotherapy, 11.3% for exposures to VPA and LTG, and 11.7% for exposures to VPA + another (non-LTG) AED. Regardless of exposure group, the frequency of MCMs increased with dose of VPA, being highest at doses ≥1,500 mg/d (24.0% for monotherapy, 31.0% for VPA + LTG, and 19.2% for VPA + other AEDs), and was similar across treatment groups at the lowest VPA dose level of <700 mg/d (5.9% for monotherapy, 7.0% for VPA + LTG, and 5.4% for VPA + other AEDs).

CONCLUSIONS: The risk of MCMs associated with VPA exposure increases with increasing VPA dose, both in the presence and in the absence of one concomitant AED, and appears to be related primarily to the dose of VPA.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeurology
Volume85
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)866-72
Number of pages7
ISSN0028-3878
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Sept 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dose-dependent teratogenicity of valproate in mono- and polytherapy: An observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this