Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Does Ondansetron Modify Sympathectomy Due to Subarachnoid Anesthesia? Meta-analysis, Meta-regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Dexamethasone Dose and Early Postoperative Recovery after Mastectomy: A Double-blind, Randomized Trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Hypotension and Stroke in Cardiac Surgery: Comment

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  3. Low Incidence of Biphasic Allergic Reactions in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care after Anaphylaxis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Modification of the World Health Organization Global Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection Is Needed

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Abdullah S Terkawi
  • Dimitris Mavridis
  • Pamela Flood
  • Jørn Wetterslev
  • Rayan S Terkawi
  • Aref A Bin Abdulhak
  • Megan S Nunemaker
  • Mohamed Tiouririne
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Disagreement among many underpowered studies has led to an equivocal understanding of the efficacy of the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron in preventing the consequences of sympathectomy after subarachnoid anesthesia. The authors assessed the efficacy of ondansetron with respect to the overall quality and statistical power of the meta-analyses.

METHODS: The authors used a standard and a newer method of meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), to estimate adjusted CIs based on how much information has been accrued. They also used random-effects meta-analyses techniques, small trial bias assessment, selection models, sensitivity analyses, and the Grading of Recommendations on Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. These results from the aforementioned techniques were compared, and importance of consideration of these factors was discussed.

RESULTS: Fourteen randomized placebo-controlled trials (1,045 subjects) were identified and analyzed. By using conventional meta-analyses, the authors determined that ondansetron was associated with reduction in the incidence of hypotension (relative risk = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.83], P = 0.001; TSA-adjusted CI, 0.34 to 1.12; I = 60%, P = 0.002) and bradycardia (relative risk = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.73], P = 0.001; TSA-adjusted CI, 0.05 to 3.85; I = 0%, P = 0.84). However, the authors found indications of bias among these trials. TSAs demonstrated that the meta-analysis lacked adequate information size and did not achieve statistical significance when adjusted for sparse data and repetitive testing. The Grading of Recommendations on Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system showed that the results had low to very low quality of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS: The analyses fail to confirm evidence that ondansetron reduces the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia after subarachnoid anesthesia due to the risk of bias and information sizes less than the required. As results from meta-analysis are given significant weight, it is important to carefully evaluate the quality of the evidence that is input.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume124
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)846-869
ISSN0003-3022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

ID: 46184376