Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Does intraoperative contamination during primary knee arthroplasty affect patient-reported outcomes for patients who are uninfected 1 year after surgery? A prospective cohort study of 714 patients

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Does cup position differ between trabecular metal and titanium cups? A radiographic propensity score matched study of 300 hips

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The implications of an aging population and increased obesity for knee arthroplasty rates in Sweden: a register-based study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. 12-year survival analysis of 322 Hintegra total ankle arthroplasties from an independent center

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Does an Antimicrobial Incision Drape Prevent Intraoperative Contamination? A Randomized Controlled Trial of 1187 Patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Universal Dermal Microbiome in Human Skin

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Reliability of stress radiography in the assessment of coronal laxity following total knee arthroplasty

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background and purpose - It is well recognized that some knee arthroplasty (KA) patients present with prolonged postoperative inflammation and some develop persistent pain. It can reasonably be speculated that some of these problems develop because of low-grade infections with low virulence bacteria caused by intraoperative contamination. This prospective study was performed to investigate whether intraoperative contamination results in lower patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for patients who were clinically uninfected in the first year after surgery. Patients and methods - We combined data from 2 major prospective studies on patients undergoing primary KA at 2 Danish hospitals between September 2016 and January 2018. Pre- and postoperative (1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months) PROs and intraoperative microbiological cultures were obtained on a total of 714 patients who were included in the study. Based on the microbiological cultures, the patients were divided into 2 groups, contaminated and non-contaminated, and differences in PROs between the 2 groups were analyzed. Results - 84 of 714 (12%) patients were intraoperatively contaminated; none of the 714 patients developed clinical infection. The preoperative Oxford Knee Score was 24 and 23 for contaminated and non-contaminated patients, respectively, improving to 40 and 39 at 1 year (p = 0.8). 1-year AUC for Oxford Knee Score and absolute improvement at each postoperative time point for Forgotten Joint Score and EQ-5D-5L also were similar between contaminated and non-contaminated patients. Interpretation - Patient-reported outcomes from 714 patients do not indicate that intraoperative contamination affects the knee-specific or general health-related quality of life in primary KA patients who are clinically uninfected 1 year after surgery.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume91
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)750-755
Number of pages6
ISSN1745-3674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

ID: 62067075