Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study

Laerke Marijke Noerholk*, Anne M Morcke, Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram, Lone N Nørgaard, Lotte Harmsen, Lisbeth Anita Andreasen, Nina Gros Pedersen, Vilma Johnsson, Anishan Vamadevan, Martin Grønnebaek Tolsgaard

*Corresponding author for this work
4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Collaborative skills learning in the form of dyad learning compared with individual learning has been shown to lead to non-inferior skills retention and transfer. However, we have limited knowledge on which learning activities improve collaborative skills training and how the number of collaborators may impact skills transfer. We explored the effects of skills training individually, in dyads, triads or tetrads on learning activities during training and on subsequent skills transfer.

METHODS: In a randomised, controlled study, participants completed a pre-post-transfer-test set-up in groups of one to four. Participants completed 2 hours of obstetric ultrasound training. In the dyad, triad and tetrad group participants took turns actively handling the ultrasound probe. All performances were rated by two blinded experts using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale and a Global Rating Scale (GRS). All training was video recorded, and learning activities were analysed using the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework.

RESULTS: One hundred one participants completed the simulation-based training, and ninety-seven completed the transfer test. Performance scores improved significantly from pre- to post-test for all groups (p < 0.001, ηp2  = 0.55). However, group size did not affect transfer test performance on OSAUS scores (p = 0.13, ηp2  = 0.06) or GRS scores (p = 0.23, ηp2  = 0.05). ICAP analyses of training activities showed that time spent on non-learning and passive learning activities increased with group size (p < 0.001, ηp2  = 0.31), whereas time spent on constructive and interactive learning activities was constant between groups compared with singles (p < 0.001, ηp2  = 0.72).

CONCLUSION: Collaborative skills learning in groups of up to four did not impair skills transfer despite less hands-on time. This may be explained by a compensatory shift towards constructive and interactive learning activities that outweigh the effect of shorter hands-on time.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMedical Education
Volume56
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)680-689
Number of pages10
ISSN0308-0110
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Clinical Competence
  • Educational Measurement
  • Humans
  • Learning
  • Simulation Training
  • Ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this