Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Do we reach the patients with the most problems? Baseline data from the WebCan study among survivors of head-and-neck cancer, Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. A person-centered intervention targeting the psychosocial needs of gynecological cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Depressive symptom trajectories in women affected by breast cancer and their male partners: a nationwide prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Work ability of survivors of breast, prostate, and testicular cancer in Nordic countries: a NOCWO study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Community-based football in men with prostate cancer: 1-year follow-up on a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Correction: Educational delay and attainment in persons with neurofibromatosis 1 in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Publisher Correction: Mendelian randomisation study of the relationship between vitamin D and risk of glioma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: This study seeks to assess the differences in disease and socioeconomic characteristics, late effects and long-term quality of life (QoL) after head-and-neck cancer (HNC) among participants and non-participants.

METHODS: Five hundred sixty recurrence-free survivors treated for HNC at least 6 months previously were invited to participate in a repeated measure, controlled intervention study of computerized Patient Reported Outcome (PRO), which is provided to treating physicians at the point of care. Two hundred sixty-six consented to participate, and 292 declined; of those who declined, 103 filled in the baseline questionnaire. Late effects and QoL were evaluated on the EORTC QLQ C-30 and EORTC QLQ H&N35 and HADS questionnaires, and an empirically derived symptom list was prepared with hospital clinicians.

RESULTS: Participants were younger, had a higher educational level, were more likely to cohabit, less likely to smoke, used less alcohol and were more likely to have HPV than those who declined but did not differ by gender, cancer site, stage or time since diagnosis. Participants reported significantly better QoL and functioning and less severe symptoms than those who declined participation other than filling in the baseline questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS: Late symptoms are common in HNC survivors. A wide diversity of self-reported late effects was found in this trial with participants significantly less affected than non-participants.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Generalizable data on non-participation may aid in the interpretation of studies on HNC survivors in general and may have relevance for targeting recruitment and maintenance in rehabilitation and follow-up care, outside clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice
Volume10
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)251-60
ISSN1932-2259
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

ID: 45997430