Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discriminative validity of the Danish version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

Michelle Stahlhut, Gunvor Gard, Mette Aadahl, Jette Christensen

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) assesses functional status in children with disabilities aged 0.5-7.5 years. The purpose of this study was to examine if the Danish version of the PEDI was able to discriminate between nondisabled children and children with cerebral palsy (CP) or juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Convenience sampling was used to select the clinical samples that consisted of 22 children with CP and 14 children with JIA aged 1.5-7.5 years. An additional sample, consisting of 224 nondisabled children aged 1.0-5.9 years, was obtained on the basis of random sampling. The PEDI was administered as a questionnaire completed by the parents. Results from receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that in the case of discrimination between children with CP and nondisabled children, the sensitivity and specificity were 77.3 and 97.8%, respectively. In the discrimination between children with JIA and nondisabled children, the sensitivity and specificity were 99.8 and 81.7%, respectively. Study results indicate that the Danish version of the PEDI shows good discriminative validity. Further studies of the discriminative validity are recommended.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics
Volume31
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)78-89
Number of pages12
ISSN0194-2638
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discriminative validity of the Danish version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this