Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Digital Shared Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Mood and Activity Measured Using Smartphones in Unipolar Depressive Disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Assessment of Suicide Risks During the First Week Immediately After Discharge From Psychiatric Inpatient Facility

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Automatically Generated Smartphone Data in Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Bipolar Disorder and Healthy Controls

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Editorial: Thinking through the Schizophrenia Spectrum: Nosological Scenarios and Perspectives beyond Psychosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Risk variants and polygenic architecture of disruptive behavior disorders in the context of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Associations between patterns in comorbid diagnostic trajectories of individuals with schizophrenia and etiological factors

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Pleiotropy between language impairment and broader behavioral disorders-an investigation of both common and rare genetic variants

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. A Nationwide Cohort Study of Nonrandom Mating in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) in mental healthcare has received increased attention as a process to reinforce person-centered care. With the rapid development of digital health technology, researchers investigate how digital interventions may be utilized to support SDM. Despite the promise of digital interventions to support SDM, the effect of these in mental healthcare has not been evaluated before. Thus, this paper aims to assess the effect of SDM interventions complimented by digital technology in mental healthcare. Objective: The objective of this review was to systematically examine the effectiveness of digital SDM interventions on patient outcomes as investigated in randomized trials. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on digital SDM interventions for people with a mental health condition. We searched for relevant studies in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search strategy included terms relating to SDM, digital systems, mental health conditions, and study type. The primary outcome was patient activation or indices of the same (e.g., empowerment and self-efficacy), adherence to treatment, hospital admissions, severity of symptoms, and level of functioning. Secondary outcomes were satisfaction, decisional conflict, working alliance, usage, and adherence of medicine; and adverse events were defined as harms or side effects. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria with outcome data from 2,400 participants. Digital SDM interventions had a moderate positive effect as compared with a control condition on patient activation [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.56, CI: 0.10, 1.01, p = 0.02], a small effect on general symptoms (SMD = −0.17, CI: −0.31, −0.03, p = 0.02), and working alliance (SMD = 0.21, CI: 0.02, 0.41, p = 0.03) and for improving decisional conflict (SMD = −0.37, CI: −0.70, −0.05, p = 0.02). No effect was found on self-efficacy, other types of mental health symptoms, adverse events, or patient satisfaction. A total of 39 outcomes were narratively synthesized with results either favoring the intervention group or showing no significant differences between groups. Studies were generally assessed to have unclear or high risk of bias, and outcomes had a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) rating of low- or very low-quality evidence. Conclusions: Digital interventions to support SDM may be a promising tool in mental healthcare; but with the limited quality of research, we have little confidence in the estimates of effect. More quality research is needed to further assess the effectiveness of digital means to support SDM but also to determine which digital intervention features are most effective to support SDM. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020148132.

Original languageEnglish
Article number691251
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume12
ISSN1664-0640
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Vitger, Korsbek, Austin, Petersen, Nordentoft and Hjorthøj.

    Research areas

  • digital health (eHealth), mental health, patient activation, shared decision-making, systematic review and meta-analysis

ID: 67998803