Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Response to: Meticulous surgical technique cannot be replaced by cholangiography

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Fluorescence or X-ray cholangiography in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Associations between blood cultures after surgery for colorectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Identification of suboptimal mesh products is essential to improve the outcome after hernia surgery. This study investigated whether a national clinical database combined with administrative registries may serve as a tool for postmarketing evaluation of mesh products for hernia surgery. Methods: This was a propensity score-matched case–control cohort study comparing outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with either one particular mesh or any other synthetic mesh. Data on patients registered in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database between 2010 and 2016 were combined with administrative data from the Danish National Patient Registry. The primary outcome was operation for recurrence. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation for complications (excluding hernia recurrence), and mortality after 30 and 90 days. Results: In total, 740 patients who underwent repair with one particular mesh were matched with 1479 patients who received any other synthetic mesh. The rate of repair for hernia recurrence was significantly higher in the particular mesh group than in the reference group: 12·8 versus 6·3 per cent respectively (hazard ratio 2·09, 95 per cent c.i. 1·57 to 2·79; P < 0·001). Use of the particular mesh increased the risk of readmission (odds ratio (OR) 1·53, 1·16 to 2·01; P = 0·002) and reoperation for a complication (OR 1·60, 1·03 to 2·47, P = 0·030). No difference in mortality was found. Conclusion: Clinical registries with prospectively collected data can provide long-term surveillance of commercial mesh. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with one particular mesh was associated with an increased rate of short-term complications and double the risk of repair for recurrence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe British journal of surgery
Volume107
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1130-1136
Number of pages7
ISSN0007-1323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

ID: 59656805