Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Differences in clinical presentation between bipolar I and II disorders in the early stages of bipolar disorder: A naturalistic study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in healthy subjects revisited: A systematic review of the literature

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Hair cortisol in newly diagnosed bipolar disorder and unaffected first-degree relatives

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIM: In a naturalistic clinical study of patients in the early stages of bipolar disorders the aim was to assess differences between patients with bipolar I (BD I) and bipolar II (BD II) disorders on clinical characteristics including affective symptoms, subjective cognitive complaints, functional level, the presence of comorbid personality disorders and coping strategies.

METHODS: Diagnoses were confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders. Clinical symptoms were rated with the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and functional status using the Functional Assessment Short Test. Cognitive complaints were assessed using the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire, the presence of comorbid personality disorders using the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale and coping style using the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations.

RESULTS: In total, 344 patients were included (BD I (n=163) and BD II (n=181). Patients with BD II presented with significantly more depressive symptoms, more cognitive complaints, lower overall functioning, and a higher prevalence of comorbid personality disorders. Finally, they exhibited a trend towards using less adaptive coping styles.

LIMITATION: It cannot be omitted that some patients may have progressed from BD II to BD I. Most measures were based on patient self report.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, BD II was associated with a higher disease burden. Clinically, it is important to differentiate BD II from BD I and research wise, there is a need for tailoring and testing specific interventions towards BD II.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume208
Pages (from-to)521-527
Number of pages7
ISSN0165-0327
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2017

ID: 49574286