Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Differences in ability to perform activities of daily living among women with fibromyalgia: A cross-sectional study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Early physical and psycho-educational rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Exoskeleton gait training after spinal cord injury: An exploratory study on secondary health conditions

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Effect of postsurgical rehabilitation programmes in patients operated for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Validation of the Early Functional Abilities scale: An assessment of four dimensions in early recovery after traumatic brain injury

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Reliability of the 2- and 6-minute walk tests in neuromuscular diseases

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), the physical function subscales of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ PF) and the 36-item Short Form (SF-36 PF) can identify subgroups of women with fibromyalgia with clinically relevant differences in ability to perform activities of daily living.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS: A total of 257 women with fibromyalgia.

METHODS: Participants were evaluated with the AMPS (measuring activities of daily living motor and activities of daily living process ability), FIQ and SF-36. AMPS independence cut-offs were used to divide the participants into 4 subgroups. Clinically relevant differences between subgroups were investigated based on the AMPS, FIQ PF and SF-36 PF.

RESULT: Participants in the 4 AMPS-derived subgroups demon-strated clinically relevant differences in observed activities of daily living motor and process ability. Neither the FIQ PF nor the SF-36 PF could differentiate between subgroups with clinically relevant differences in AMPS activities of daily living process ability.

CONCLUSION: Activities of daily living process skills reflect underlying organizational and adaptive capacities of the individual and are relevant targets for interventions aiming at improving activities of daily living ability. Since self-report instruments do not capture differences in activities of daily living process ability, clinicians should include observations-based assessment of activities of daily living ability in order to individualize interventions offered.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
ISSN1651-2081
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2015

ID: 45949994