Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Psychometric validity and reliability of the Danish version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Shared decision making in high-grade glioma patients—a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Return to work following meningioma surgery: a Swedish nationwide registry-based matched cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Neurosurgical patterns of care for diffuse low-grade gliomas in Sweden between 2005 and 2015

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Investigating the response scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in German cancer patients and a population survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Size and composition of family networks of decedents: A nationwide register-based study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versions of each scale of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This study aims to develop an item bank for the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning scale, which can be used for CAT.

Methods: The complete developmental approach comprised four phases: (I) conceptualization and literature search, (II) operationalization, (III) pretesting, and (IV) field-testing. This paper describes phases I-III.I) A literature search was performed to identify self-report instruments and items measuring cognitive complaints on concentration and memory. II) A multistep item-selection procedure was applied to select and generate items that were relevant and compatible with the 'QLQ-C30 item style.' III) Cancer patients from different countries evaluated the item list for wording (ie, whether items were difficult, confusing, annoying, upsetting or intrusive), and whether relevant issues were missing.

Results: A list of 439 items was generated by the literature search. In the multistep item-selection procedure, these items were evaluated for relevance, redundancy, clarity, and response format, resulting in an list of 45 items. A total of 32 patients evaluated this item list in the pretesting phase, resulting in a preliminary list of 44 items.

Conclusion: Phase I-III resulted in an item list of 44 items measuring self-reported cognitive complaints that was endorsed by international experts and cancer patients in several countries. This list will be evaluated for its psychometric characteristics in phase IV.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuro-Oncology Practice
Volume4
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)189-196
Number of pages8
ISSN2054-2577
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

ID: 61360682