Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Development and content validation of a questionnaire measuring patient empowerment in cancer follow-up

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don't stratify on the baseline score!

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The longitudinal validity of proxy-reported CHU9D

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Regional and age differences in specialised palliative care for patients with pancreatic cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Bereavement among adult siblings: An examination of health service utilization and mental health outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and ensure the content validity of a new patient-reported outcome measure, the Cancer Patient Empowerment Questionnaire (CPEQ), to measure the level of, desire for, and enablement of empowerment among cancer patients in follow-up.

METHODS: An iterative process based on: (i) empowerment theories by Zimmerman and Tengland, (ii) a systematic review of questionnaires measuring empowerment or related concepts among cancer patients, (iii) qualitative data from 18 semi-structured interviews with Danish cancer patients in follow-up, (iv) input from a group of eight cancer patients involved as co-researchers and from an expert steering group, and (v) cognitive interviews with 15 cancer patients in follow-up.

RESULTS: The items for the CPEQ were developed and revised and 12 versions of the questionnaire were evaluated. The final version consists of 67 items, covering three different dimensions of empowerment: (A) empowerment outcomes consisting of three components: (A1) the intrapersonal-, (A2) interactional-, and (A3) behavioral component, (B) empowerment facilitators (enablement), and (C) the value of empowerment.

CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the theoretical and empirical basis for the development of the CPEQ and its content validity. The CPEQ provides a tool for researchers to assess the level of, desire for, and enablement of empowerment among cancer patients. The next steps will be to use the CPEQ in a nationwide study of empowerment in cancer follow-up and subsequently shorten the CPEQ based on psychometric methods in order to make it more relevant in clinical studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
Volume29
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)2253-2274
Number of pages22
ISSN0962-9343
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms/psychology, Patient Participation/methods, Psychometrics/methods, Quality of Life/psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient participation, PPI, Neoplasms, Empowerment, Surveys and questionnaires, Psycho-oncology, Patient-reported outcome measures, Patient-centered care

ID: 61353576