Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Developing a tool to assess competence in Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): an international Delphi consensus study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  1. Using Self-Rated Examinations to Ensure Competence in Laparoscopy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  2. Effects of shared mental models in teams performing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  3. Pretraining of basic skills on a virtual reality vitreoretinal simulator: A waste of time

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  4. Ensuring competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a validity study of a newly developed assessment tool

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emergency procedure that is potentially lifesaving in major noncompressible torso hemorrhage. It may also improve outcome in nontraumatic cardiac arrest. However, the procedure can be technically challenging and requires the immediate presence of a qualified operator. Thus, evidence-based training and assessment of operator skills are essential for successful implementation and patient safety. A prerequisite for this is a valid and reliable assessment tool specific for the procedure. The aim of this study was to develop a tool for assessing procedural competence in REBOA based on best-available knowledge from international experts in the field.

METHODS: We invited international REBOA experts from multiple specialties to participate in an anonymous three-round iterative Delphi study to reach consensus on the design and content of an assessment tool. In round 1, participants suggested items to be included. In rounds 2 and 3, the relevance of each suggested item was evaluated by all participants to reach consensus. Interround data processing was done systematically by a steering group.

RESULTS: Forty panelists representing both clinical and educational expertise in REBOA from 16 countries (in Europe, Asia, and North and South America) and seven different specialties participated in the study. After 3 Delphi rounds and 532 initial item suggestions, the panelists reached consensus on a 10-item assessment tool with behaviorally anchored rating scales. It includes assessment of teamwork, procedure time, selection and preparation of equipment, puncture technique, guidewire handling, sheath handling, placement of REBOA catheter, occlusion, and evaluation.

CONCLUSION: We present the REBOA-RATE assessment tool developed systematically by international experts in the field to optimize content validity. Following further studies of its validity and reliability, this tool represents an important next step in evidence-based training programs in REBOA, for example, using mastery learning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery
Volume91
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)310-317
Number of pages8
ISSN2163-0755
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Research areas

  • Assessment, Clinical competence, Delphi study, Expert consensus, Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, Skills

ID: 66793120