Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Detection of visual field defects by opticians - with Damato Multifixation Campimetry Online

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Periocular necrotizing soft tissue infection in Greater Copenhagen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Prevalence of anterior polar cataracts in children and risk factors for amblyopia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Correlation between retinal vein occlusion and cancer - a nationwide Danish cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Evidence-based Danish guidelines for screening of diabetic retinopathy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Pattern of mortality after menopausal hormone therapy: long-term follow up in a population-based cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Bruch's membrane allows unhindered passage of up to 2 μm latex beads in an in vivo porcine model

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Conjunctival Goblet Cells, the Overlooked Cells in Glaucoma Treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Potential link between sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy and vision loss: a case report

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: To study Damato Multifixation Campimetry Online (DMCO), an inexpensive online visual field test, used for screening at optician shops in Denmark.

METHODS: This was an evaluation of a diagnostic test and customers were included if minimum 50 years old, with a visual acuity of minimum 0.5 and with less myopia than 6 D. Standard equipment was a computer, a wireless mouse and a computer monitor. We used the 'DMCO STANDARD 4,5' algorithm for screening. DMCO results were electronically transmitted to the authors. Customers with a positive DMCO test received an eye examination including the reference standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2 SITA Fast test. A subset of control participants with a negative DMCO test received the same examination in order to estimate the number of false and true negatives. DMCO specificity and sensitivity were estimated according to five reference standards with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: The population comprised 627 individuals, 381 women and 246 men, from 13 optician shops. Mean age was 62 years (SD 7.4). DMCO was positive in 32 individuals and 27 individuals were classified as 'true positives' with diagnoses such as glaucoma, cataract and neurological visual field defects. Of the 595 individuals with a negative DMCO test, 110 were examined and nine individuals were classified as 'false negatives' according to diagnoses. Depending on reference the specificity was 97-99% and sensitivity was 14-69%.

CONCLUSION: Screening with DMCO demonstrated high specificity, whereas sensitivity was unsatisfactory. Future studies with enough power to estimate the true sensitivity is needed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume97
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)577-582
Number of pages6
ISSN1755-375X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • Aged, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Internet, Male, Middle Aged, Optometrists, Prospective Studies, Vision Disorders/diagnosis, Visual Acuity, Visual Field Tests/methods, Visual Fields/physiology

ID: 56579310