Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments - evaluation of national screening guidelines

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. A new approach to put isolation precaution guidelines into practice

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearch

  2. Concerns regarding the validity of the conclusion in a recently published paper on Roche Liat implementation

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  3. Traffic flow and microbial air contamination in operating rooms at a major teaching hospital in Ghana

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).

AIM: To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated.

METHODS: This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated.

FINDINGS: Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25-75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7-52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1-81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated.

CONCLUSION: The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of hospital infection
Volume104
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)27-32
Number of pages6
ISSN0195-6701
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Research areas

  • CPE, Emergency department, Isolation, MRSA, Multi-resistant bacteria, Screening tool

ID: 58311144