Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Detection of illness worry in the general population: A specific item on illness rumination improves the Whiteley Index

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Self-reported health status and the associated risk of mortality in heart failure: The DANISH trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Mental health is a risk factor for poor outcomes in cardiac patients: Findings from the national DenHeart survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory: A Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. DenHeart: Differences in physical and mental health across cardiac diagnoses at hospital discharge

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The Duffy-null genotype and risk of infection

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Cardiac Troponin I and Incident Stroke in European Cohorts: Insights From the BiomarCaRE Project

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with bullous pemphigoid and all bullous disorders in the Danish national registers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: The Whiteley Index (WI) is the most widely used screening tool for health anxiety/illness worry. Diverse versions (different number of items and factors) have been used. We aimed to examine psychometric properties of 7 items of the WI besides adding a new item on obsessive illness rumination for better future detection of health anxiety.

METHODS: Data from a large population-based study in Denmark (N = 9656). Construct validity was examined by exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) plus hypothesis testing. Criterion validity was evaluated via Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) using a diagnostic criterion as gold standard.

RESULTS: Factor loadings of EFA revealed viable one-factor models (6, 7, or 8 items) and two-factor models (7 or 8 items). Factor one indicated a dimension of illness worry. Factor two indicated a somatic symptoms dimension. The new item on obsessive illness rumination merged well with the existing items. EFA of two-factor models and one-factor 6-item model showed good fit. CFA resembles these findings. A one-factor 6-item model (including the item on obsessive illness rumination and excluding two items concerning somatic symptoms) was chosen as the optimal model and presented good criterion validity: AUC 0.88 (95%CI(0.84;0.92)). Main hypotheses concerning associations with somatic symptoms, anxiety, and depression were met.

CONCLUSIONS: We found good psychometric properties for a new one-factor 6-item version of the WI. Through elimination of items concerning somatic symptoms and inclusion of obsessive illness rumination, we propose a clear, unidimensional and improved measure of illness worry: Whiteley-6-R.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume138
Pages (from-to)110245
ISSN0022-3999
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

ID: 60906190