TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Systematic TRUS-Biopsies in a Population-Based Setting Over a 20 Year Period
AU - Kawa, Sandra Miriam
AU - Stroomberg, Hein Vincent
AU - Larsen, Signe Benzon
AU - Helgstrand, John Thomas
AU - Toft, Birgitte Grønkær
AU - Brasso, Klaus
AU - Røder, Martin Andreas
N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of systematic TRUS-biopsies in a population-based setting to detect clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in combination with age, clinical tumor category (cT), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men referred for the first biopsy.METHODS: We identified all men referred for PCa work-up because of elevated PSA who underwent initial TRUS-biopsies in the nationwide Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DaPCaR) between January 1st, 1995 and December 31st, 2016, in Denmark. Risk of histologic findings in initial TRUS-biopsies categorized as non-malignant, insignificant PCa, or significant PCa (csPCa). We defined csPCa as any biopsy containing Gleason score 3 + 4 or above as in the PRECISION trial. We assessed risk of csPCa with absolute risk, logistic regression model, and predicted risks.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After exclusions, our cohort included 39,886 men. The diagnostic hit rate for csPCa was 40.8 %. Men with PSA > 20 ng/mL and ≥cT2 harbor a risk >75% for finding csPCa in the first TRUS biopsy-set. Men with cT1 tumors and PSA < 20 ng/mL have a risk of non-malignant histology of at least 58%. Limitations include the high number of exclusions based on missing information.CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of systematic TRUS-biopsies is high for men with palpable tumors and high PSA. Our data point to the fact that not all men need pre-biopsy MRI to find csPCa.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of systematic TRUS-biopsies in a population-based setting to detect clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in combination with age, clinical tumor category (cT), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men referred for the first biopsy.METHODS: We identified all men referred for PCa work-up because of elevated PSA who underwent initial TRUS-biopsies in the nationwide Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DaPCaR) between January 1st, 1995 and December 31st, 2016, in Denmark. Risk of histologic findings in initial TRUS-biopsies categorized as non-malignant, insignificant PCa, or significant PCa (csPCa). We defined csPCa as any biopsy containing Gleason score 3 + 4 or above as in the PRECISION trial. We assessed risk of csPCa with absolute risk, logistic regression model, and predicted risks.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After exclusions, our cohort included 39,886 men. The diagnostic hit rate for csPCa was 40.8 %. Men with PSA > 20 ng/mL and ≥cT2 harbor a risk >75% for finding csPCa in the first TRUS biopsy-set. Men with cT1 tumors and PSA < 20 ng/mL have a risk of non-malignant histology of at least 58%. Limitations include the high number of exclusions based on missing information.CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of systematic TRUS-biopsies is high for men with palpable tumors and high PSA. Our data point to the fact that not all men need pre-biopsy MRI to find csPCa.
KW - Clinically significance
KW - Pre-biopsy MRI
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - TRUS-biopsies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111527064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.007
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.007
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34171348
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 155
SP - 20
EP - 25
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -