Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

Merete Watt Boolsen; Lise Munk Plum; Jens G Hillingsø

Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

Translated title of the contribution: The quality of the survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences is questionable.

Merete Watt Boolsen, Lise Munk Plum, Jens G Hillingsø

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.

Translated title of the contribution	The quality of the survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences is questionable.
Original language	Danish
Journal	Ugeskrift for Laeger
Volume	175
Issue number	35
Pages (from-to)	1954-1957
Number of pages	4
ISSN	0041-5782
Publication status	Published - 26 Aug 2013

Cite this

@article{bb6147d847364d71933feaad84f537c3,

title = "Den landsd{\ae}kkende unders{\o}gelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet",

abstract = "We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.",

author = "Boolsen, \{Merete Watt\} and Plum, \{Lise Munk\} and Hillings{\o}, \{Jens G\}",

year = "2013",

month = aug,

day = "26",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "175",

pages = "1954--1957",

journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",

issn = "0041-5782",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "35",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

AU - Boolsen, Merete Watt

AU - Plum, Lise Munk

AU - Hillingsø, Jens G

PY - 2013/8/26

Y1 - 2013/8/26

N2 - We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.

AB - We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84890690218

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

C2 - 23978118

SN - 0041-5782

VL - 175

SP - 1954

EP - 1957

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

IS - 35

ER -

Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this