Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Demographic, Clinical, and Prognostic Factors of Ovarian Clear Cell Adenocarcinomas According to Endometriosis Status

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Publisher Correction: Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Investigation of Viruses in Human Cancers by Multienrichment Approach

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Association between genetically predicted polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. A Comprehensive Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis in Ovarian Cancer using Genome-wide Significant Common Variants

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: Women with endometriosis carry an increased risk for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinomas (CCCs). Clear cell adenocarcinoma may develop from endometriosis lesions. Few studies have compared clinical and prognostic factors and overall survival in patients diagnosed as having CCC according to endometriosis status.

METHODS: Population-based prospectively collected data on CCC with coexisting pelvic (including ovarian; n = 80) and ovarian (n = 46) endometriosis or without endometriosis (n = 95) were obtained through the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. χ Test, independent-samples t test, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier test, and Cox regression were used. Statistical tests were 2 sided. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: Patients with CCC and pelvic or ovarian endometriosis were significantly younger than CCC patients without endometriosis, and a higher proportion of them were nulliparous (28% and 31% vs 17% (P = 0.07 and P = 0.09). Accordingly, a significantly higher proportion of women without endometriosis had given birth to more than 1 child. Interestingly, a significantly higher proportion of patients with ovarian endometriosis had pure CCCs (97.8% vs 82.1%; P = 0.001) as compared with patients without endometriosis. Overall survival was poorer among CCC patients with concomitant ovarian endometriosis (hazard ratio, 2.56 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-5.02], in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: Age at CCC diagnosis and parity as well as histology differ between CCC patients with and without concomitant endometriosis. Furthermore, CCC patients with concomitant ovarian endometriosis have a poorer prognosis compared with endometriosis-negative CCC patients. These differences warrant further research to determine whether CCCs with and without concomitant endometriosis develop through distinct pathogenic pathways.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
Volume27
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1804-1812
ISSN1048-891X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52205727