Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Definition of resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for inclusion in clinical trials: A clinical case review by a pan-European multidisciplinary expert panel led by the EORTC Lung Cancer Group

Mariana Brandão*, Elena Prisciandaro, Eleni Xenophontos, Alessio Mariolo, Amir H Sadeghi, Andrea R Filippi, Antonin Levy, Artur Bandura, Caroline Caramella, Chris Dickhoff, Constance de Margerie-Mellon, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Daniel Portik, David Sanchez-Lorente, Dirk De Ruysscher, Egbert Smit, Elisa Gobbini, Elie Fadel, Enrico Ruffini, Emanuela OlmettoFrancesco Cortiula, Idris Bahce, Ilias Houda, Isabelle Opitz, Jarushka Naidoo, John Edwards, Jordi Remon, José Carlos Benitez, Juan Carlos Trujillo, Jules Derks, Karim Amrane, Koen J Hartemink, Konstantinos Stathopoulos, Lizza E L Hendriks, Manoli Iglesias, Mario Occhipinti, Matthias Guckenberger, Niccolo Giaj Levra, Nicolas Girard, Noemi Reguart, Olaf Mercier, Paolo Bironzo, Paul Hofman, René Horsleben Petersen, Riccardo De Angelis, Ronan Abgral, Safae Terrisse, Sanjay Popat, Thomas Pierret, Torsten Gerriet Blum, European Organisation for Research, Treatment of Cancer EORTC Lung Cancer Group

*Corresponding author for this work
5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, leading to ambiguity in resectability criteria. This has prompted the EORTC Lung Cancer Group to establish a standardized definition of resectability for clinical trials. A Delphi consensus process was initiated, including a systematic review, survey, and clinical cases review. Here, we report exclusively the results of the clinical cases review, aimed to categorize cases based on tumor and lymph node factors, to identify those deemed surgically resectable upfront.

METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical stage III NSCLC (8th TNM edition) treated at Institut Jules Bordet between 2016-2021 were identified. These cases underwent evaluation by multidisciplinary panels (MDT), comprising thoracic surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists/pulmonologists and imaging specialists. The MDT determined the resectability of each tumor, and non-consensual cases underwent a second and a third discussion rounds. A TNM-subset was classified as "resectable" if ≥75 % of cases within that category were deemed "resectable" following multiple rounds of review.

RESULTS: Among 105 cases, 52 % of tumors were stage IIIA, 36 % stage IIIB and 11 % stage IIIC. After the first two review rounds, 13 % of cases were classified as "no consensus" and moved to a third round. The main reasons were suboptimal imaging (n = 8), incomplete invasive mediastinal staging to assess the N factor (n = 3), and disagreement on the resectability of T4 tumors invading thoracic structures or with multi-station/bulky N2 disease (n = 3). After the third review round, T3-T4 tumors based on size/satellite nodules and/or with N1-N2 single-station involvement were considered resectable. In contrast, many invasive T4-tumors were considered unresectable, especially if combined with N2-N3 disease. N2-multi-station, N2-bulky or N3 involvement were generally considered unresectable (100 %/95 %/95 % respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: After a multiple-round multidisciplinary review of real-world cases, consensus was reached for most TNM-subsets, except for invasive T4N0 tumors. This case review informed the Consensual Definition of Resectable stage III NSCLC in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108798
JournalLung Cancer
Volume209
Pages (from-to)108798
ISSN0169-5002
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Real-world
  • Resectable
  • Stage III
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Definition of resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for inclusion in clinical trials: A clinical case review by a pan-European multidisciplinary expert panel led by the EORTC Lung Cancer Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this