Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Current clinical algorithms for predicting common bile duct stones have only moderate accuracy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Large Incisional Hernias Increase in Size

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Determinants for symptomatic gallstone disease readmissions - results from a cohort with screen-detected gallstone disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Open ventral hernia repair with a composite ventral patch - final results of a multicenter prospective study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A risk-stratified approach for selecting patients likely to harbor common bile duct (CBD) stones to proceed directly to endoscopic or surgical stone clearance, rather than undergo less invasive testing, has been proposed. We assessed the performance of three clinical algorithms used to predict CBD stones.

METHODS: All patients undergoing first-time endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 2011-2012 as a result of suspected CBD stones were enrolled prospectively in a clinical database. Data such as imaging test findings and liver function tests (LFTs) were collected 48 h prior to and on the day of ERCP. Patients were stratified into different risk groups for harboring CBD stones according to three clinical algorithms using imaging and laboratory data. Findings on ERCP were used as gold standard. Performance characteristics of each algorithm were separately calculated for each time point of LFT assessment.

RESULTS: Overall, 186 patients were analyzed, 75% of whom presented CBD stones on ERCP. Proportion of patients categorized as high-risk for harboring CBD stones varied among the three algorithms (67% vs 73% vs 56%). Also, the algorithms showed only moderate, albeit comparable, accuracy for predicting the presence of CBD stones (0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.68 vs 0.68, 95% CI 0.63-0.67 vs 0.59, 95% CI 0.57-0.61). Similar results were obtained when performance characteristics were recalculated using LFT from 48 h prior to ERCP (data not shown).

CONCLUSION: Three diagnostic algorithms commonly used for predicting CBD stones have comparable but only moderate accuracy. Further research is warranted to improve risk stratification of patients with suspected CBD stones.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDigestive Endoscopy
Volume30
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)477-484
Number of pages8
ISSN0915-5635
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

ID: 55450685