Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Links

DOI

  1. Physical activity monitors to enhance amount of physical activity in older adults - a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Physical activity in the acute ward following hip fracture surgery is associated with less fear of falling

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The Effect of Reduced Physical Activity and Retraining on Blood Lipids and Body Composition in Young and Older Adult Men

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Injuries in Novice Participants during an Eight-Week Start up CrossFit Program-A Prospective Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Infographic. Therapeutic exercise relieves pain and does not harm knee cartilage nor trigger inflammation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Knee osteoarthritis risk is increased 4-6 fold after knee injury - a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. When enough is enough - How to determine when the evidence for the effectiveness of a treatment is sufficient?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Few studies have investigated the measurement properties of consumer-grade physical activity monitors (PAMs) in older adults. Therefore, we investigated the criterion validity of consumer-grade PAMs in older adults and whether the measurement properties differed between older adults with and without rollators and whether worn on the hip or at the wrist.

Methods: Consumer-grade PAMs were eligible for inclusion in this study if they: 1) could be fastened at the hip as well as on the wrist, 2) were simple in function and design and thus easy to use for participants with minimal technical skills, 3) included step-counting as outcome measure and 4) were powered by a button cell battery. Participants performed self-paced walking for six minutes while two physiotherapists counted their steps with a click-counter. The average of the two counts was used as criterion. The participants wore 16 monitors, four located bilaterally on both hips and wrists. Our prior expectation was that all monitors would have at least moderate criterion validity for all participants, good criterion validity for participants walking without a rollator and poor criterion validity for participants walking with a rollator.

Results: Four physical activity monitors were included in this study; Misfit Shine, Nokia GO, Jawbone UP Move and Garmin Vivofit 3. A total of 103 older adults participated.Nokia GO was excluded from this study due to technical issues. Therefore, we present results on the frequency of data loss, ICC (1, 2) and percentage measurement error for Misfit Shine, Garmin Vivofit 3 and Jawbone UP Move located on four different positions.

Conclusions: The hip-worn PAMs did not differ significantly in terms of measurement error or criterion validity. Wrist-worn monitors cannot adequately measure number of steps in a population of older adults using rollators. The hip-worn PAMs were superior to wrist-worn PAMs among older adults with and without rollators.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Aging and Physical Activity
Volume17
Pages (from-to)1
Number of pages10
ISSN1813-7253
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

ID: 59128292