Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Cost of Treating Skin Problems in Patients with Diabetes who Use Insulin Pumps and/or Glucose Sensors

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Insulin pump settings during breastfeeding in women with type 1 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Glucose Sensor Accuracy After Subcutaneous Glucagon Injections Near to Sensor Site

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Between Abdominal and Upper Arm Insertion Sites

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Skin Problems Due to Treatment with Technology Are Associated with Increased Disease Burden Among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Prevalence of asthma in patients with atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Risk of systemic infections in adults with atopic dermatitis: A nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Real-world evidence of dupilumab efficacy and risk of adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: The use of insulin pump and glucose sensor is advantageous, but unfortunately many experience skin problems. To reduce or overcome skin problems, patients use additional products or change their sets preterm. Therefore, the aim was to investigate costs related to skin problems. Materials and Methods: Two hundred sixty-three patients from four different hospitals in Denmark participated in a cross-sectional survey about skin problems related to insulin pump and/or glucose sensor use. Additional costs aside technology and diabetes treatment were calculated based on adhesives, patches, lotion, and preterm shifts of infusion or sensor sets due to skin problems. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were used. Results: The total costs for all these expenses were 11493.9 U.S. dollars (USD) in 145 pediatric patients and 4843 USD in 118 adult patients. The costs were higher in patients with, than without, skin problems and for skin problems due to the glucose sensor compared with insulin pump. Pediatric patients with eczema and/or wound due to the glucose sensor did cost 154.3 USD more, than patients without these skin problems (P < 0.01). We found a clear dose/response relationship between costs and severity of skin problems, especially in pediatric patients. Conclusions: Our data show that skin problems due to use of insulin pump and/or glucose sensor have significant costs on the Danish welfare system. This leaves an economic incentive for developing more skin-sensitive adhesive for the infusion set and sensors, at least for a certain subgroup of patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Volume22
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)658-665
Number of pages8
ISSN1520-9156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sep 2020

    Research areas

  • Continuous glucose monitoring, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, Dermatology, Pediatric, Type 1 diabetes

ID: 58898780