TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibody and maternal immunization against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants
T2 - Evaluation for six European countries
AU - Getaneh, Abraham M
AU - Li, Xiao
AU - Mao, Zhuxin
AU - Johannesen, Caroline K
AU - Barbieri, Elisa
AU - van Summeren, Jojanneke
AU - Wang, Xin
AU - Tong, Sabine
AU - Baraldi, Eugenio
AU - Phijffer, Emily
AU - Rizzo, Caterina
AU - van Wijhe, Maarten
AU - Heikkinen, Terho
AU - Bont, Louis
AU - Willem, Lander
AU - Jit, Mark
AU - Beutels, Philippe
AU - Bilcke, Joke
AU - for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe (RESCEU) investigators
A2 - Fischer, Thea Kølsen
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/2/24
Y1 - 2023/2/24
N2 - BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) imposes a substantial burden on pediatric hospital capacity in Europe. Promising prophylactic interventions against RSV including monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and maternal immunizations (MI) are close to licensure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of potential mAb and MI interventions against RSV in infants, for six European countries.METHODS: We used a static cohort model to compare costs and health effects of four intervention programs to no program and to each other: year-round MI, year-round mAb, seasonal mAb (October to April), and seasonal mAb plus a catch-up program in October. Input parameters were obtained from national registries and literature. Influential input parameters were identified with the expected value of partial perfect information and extensive scenario analyses (including the impact of interventions on wheezing and asthma).RESULTS: From the health care payer perspective, and at a price of €50 per dose (mAb and MI), seasonal mAb plus catch-up was cost-saving in Scotland, and cost-effective for willingness-to-pay (WTP) values ≥€20,000 (England, Finland) or €30,000 (Denmark) per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for all scenarios considered, except when using ICD-10 based hospitalization data. For the Netherlands, seasonal mAb was preferred (WTP value: €30,000-€90,000) for most scenarios. For Veneto region (Italy), either seasonal mAb with or without catch-up or MI was preferred, depending on the scenario and WTP value. From a full societal perspective (including leisure time lost), the seasonal mAb plus catch-up program was cost-saving for all countries except the Netherlands.CONCLUSION: The choice between a MI or mAb program depends on the level and duration of protection, price, availability, and feasibility of such programs, which should be based on the latest available evidence. Future research should focus on measuring accurately age-specific RSV-attributable hospitalizations in very young children.
AB - BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) imposes a substantial burden on pediatric hospital capacity in Europe. Promising prophylactic interventions against RSV including monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and maternal immunizations (MI) are close to licensure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of potential mAb and MI interventions against RSV in infants, for six European countries.METHODS: We used a static cohort model to compare costs and health effects of four intervention programs to no program and to each other: year-round MI, year-round mAb, seasonal mAb (October to April), and seasonal mAb plus a catch-up program in October. Input parameters were obtained from national registries and literature. Influential input parameters were identified with the expected value of partial perfect information and extensive scenario analyses (including the impact of interventions on wheezing and asthma).RESULTS: From the health care payer perspective, and at a price of €50 per dose (mAb and MI), seasonal mAb plus catch-up was cost-saving in Scotland, and cost-effective for willingness-to-pay (WTP) values ≥€20,000 (England, Finland) or €30,000 (Denmark) per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for all scenarios considered, except when using ICD-10 based hospitalization data. For the Netherlands, seasonal mAb was preferred (WTP value: €30,000-€90,000) for most scenarios. For Veneto region (Italy), either seasonal mAb with or without catch-up or MI was preferred, depending on the scenario and WTP value. From a full societal perspective (including leisure time lost), the seasonal mAb plus catch-up program was cost-saving for all countries except the Netherlands.CONCLUSION: The choice between a MI or mAb program depends on the level and duration of protection, price, availability, and feasibility of such programs, which should be based on the latest available evidence. Future research should focus on measuring accurately age-specific RSV-attributable hospitalizations in very young children.
KW - Antibodies, Monoclonal
KW - Child
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - Immunization
KW - Infant
KW - Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control
KW - Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human
KW - Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
KW - Seasonal program
KW - Monoclonal antibody
KW - Disease burden
KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - Maternal vaccine
KW - Perspective
KW - Expected value of perfect information (EVPI)
KW - Expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147590318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.058
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.058
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36737318
VL - 41
SP - 1623
EP - 1631
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
SN - 0264-410X
IS - 9
ER -