Abstract
The authors regret that errors were present in the above article. The end concentrations of chlorhexidine should be 0.0025, 0.25, 25 and 2 500 ng mL−1. The corrected figure 2 is present below: [Figure presented] The corrected legend of figure 3 is also present below: Fig 3. Representative plots of mast cell activation tests with chlorhexidine. Cultured human mast cells were activated with chlorhexidine (2 500 ng ml−1) after passive sensitisation of the cells with serum of a patient with positive skin test and basophil activation test (ST+BAT+), or a patient with negative skin test and basophil activation test (ST–BAT–). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 748-749 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| ISSN | 0007-0912 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to ‘Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy: a proof of concept’ (Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 970–5) (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2020) 125(6) (970–975), (S0007091220304827), (10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS