Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)

NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network; Arash Afshari

doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)

NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network, Arash Afshari

Abstract

The authors regret that errors were present in the above article.

On page 1174, in the second paragraph of the Statistical methods section, the second sentence should read as follows:

The incidence of difficult intubation was determined including those whose tracheas were already intubated and is reported as a percentage with a 95% exact binomial CI.

On page 1175, in the third paragraph of the Statistical methods section ‘mean standardised difference (MSD)’ should read ‘standardised mean difference (SMD)’

The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused

Original language	English
Publication date	Aug 2021
Edition	2
Volume	127
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015
Publication status	Published - Aug 2021

Series	British Journal of Anaesthesia
ISSN	0007-0912

Access to Document

10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network, & Afshari, A. (2021, Aug). Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81). (2 ed.) British Journal of Anaesthesia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE) : a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81). / NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network ; Afshari, Arash.

2 ed. 2021. (British Journal of Anaesthesia).

Research output: Other contribution › Research

NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network & Afshari, A 2021, Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81).. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network, Afshari A. Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network ; Afshari, Arash. / Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE) : a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81). 2021. (British Journal of Anaesthesia).

@misc{146849675e3948899b4973a5cd7e0372,

title = "Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)",

abstract = "The authors regret that errors were present in the above article.On page 1174, in the second paragraph of the Statistical methods section, the second sentence should read as follows:The incidence of difficult intubation was determined including those whose tracheas were already intubated and is reported as a percentage with a 95% exact binomial CI.On page 1175, in the third paragraph of the Statistical methods section {\textquoteleft}mean standardised difference (MSD){\textquoteright} should read {\textquoteleft}standardised mean difference (SMD){\textquoteright}The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused",

author = "Nicola Disma and Katalin Virag and Thomas Riva and Jost Kaufmann and Thomas Engelhardt and Walid Habre and {NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network} and Arash Afshari",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015",

language = "English",

volume = "127",

series = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

edition = "2",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Corrigendum to 'Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE)

T2 - a prospective European multicentre observational study' (Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1173-81)

AU - Disma, Nicola

AU - Virag, Katalin

AU - Riva, Thomas

AU - Kaufmann, Jost

AU - Engelhardt, Thomas

AU - Habre, Walid

AU - NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network

AU - Afshari, Arash

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - The authors regret that errors were present in the above article.On page 1174, in the second paragraph of the Statistical methods section, the second sentence should read as follows:The incidence of difficult intubation was determined including those whose tracheas were already intubated and is reported as a percentage with a 95% exact binomial CI.On page 1175, in the third paragraph of the Statistical methods section ‘mean standardised difference (MSD)’ should read ‘standardised mean difference (SMD)’The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused

AB - The authors regret that errors were present in the above article.On page 1174, in the second paragraph of the Statistical methods section, the second sentence should read as follows:The incidence of difficult intubation was determined including those whose tracheas were already intubated and is reported as a percentage with a 95% exact binomial CI.On page 1175, in the third paragraph of the Statistical methods section ‘mean standardised difference (MSD)’ should read ‘standardised mean difference (SMD)’The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused

U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015

M3 - Other contribution

C2 - 34119312

VL - 127

T3 - British Journal of Anaesthesia

ER -