Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Conversion of standard retrospective patient-reported outcomes to momentary versions: cognitive interviewing reveals varying degrees of momentary compatibility

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: the HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Quality of life improves in children and adolescents during a community-based overweight and obesity treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Age-related renal function decline in Fabry disease patients on enzyme replacement therapy: a longitudinal cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. A new model of early, integrated palliative care: palliative rehabilitation for newly diagnosed patients with non-resectable cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Antiemetic use of olanzapine in patients with advanced cancer: results from an open-label multicenter study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Safety of switching to Migalastat from enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: Experience from the Phase 3 ATTRACT study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to adapt different domains of an existing retrospective questionnaire to momentary versions, to use and assess cognitive interviewing for evaluating the new versions, and to compare momentary compatibility (i.e. an item's potential to be validly converted to a momentary version) across different scales.

METHODS: Initial momentary versions of retrospective patient-reported outcomes were produced by converting present perfect tense wording to present tense wording. Cognitive interviews were conducted iteratively with 21 patients to determine which reference period they actually employed, and to identify problems with new, revised versions. A think-aloud interview protocol was supplemented with non-specific concurrent and specific retrospective probing. The momentary compatibility of each item was evaluated by calculating the proportion of interviews wherein momentary reference periods were identified; problems were categorized according to cognitive aspects of survey methodology taxonomy. The efficiency of various cognitive interviewing techniques was determined by evaluating whether applied reference periods were identified by think-aloud alone or by supplementary probes.

RESULTS: The momentary compatibility varied from 5 to 100% across items. Cognitive interviews revealed potential problems of various severities in the majority of items. Think-aloud alone was sufficient at determining the applied reference period in one-third of the cases, and the efficiency of additional concurrent and retrospective probing was 50 and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive interviewing techniques proved useful for developing and evaluating momentary items. Researchers should be aware of the applied reference period and of emerging problems when evaluating adapted momentary items, since not all concepts are suitable. We recommend the proposed method in future adaptations of existing instruments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
Volume27
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1065-1076
ISSN0962-9343
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52398555