Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Contemporary management of penetrating renal trauma - A national analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Developing and validating COVID-19 adverse outcome risk prediction models from a bi-national European cohort of 5594 patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Identification of a new genetic variant associated with cholecystitis: a multicenter genome-wide association study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for pelvic trauma: Effectiveness and safety

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Refugee Access to Surgical Care in Lebanon: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SCAR Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Majed W El Hechi
  • Charlie Nederpelt
  • Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan
  • Alexander Bonde
  • Nikolaos Kokoroskos
  • Kerry Breen
  • Ahmed Nasser
  • Noelle N Saillant
  • Haytham M A Kaafarani
  • George C Velmahos
  • April E Mendoza
View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: Indications for nonoperative management (NOM) after penetrating renal injury remain ill-defined. Using a national database, we sought to describe the experience of operative and nonoperative management in the United States and retrospectively examine risk factors for failure of NOM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TQIP database 2010-2016 was used to identify patients with penetrating renal trauma. Outcomes of patients treated with an immediate operation (IO) and NOM are described. Failure of NOM was defined as the need for a renal operation after 4 h from arrival. Univariate then multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of NOM failure.

RESULTS: Out of 8139 patients with kidney trauma, 1,842 had a penetrating mechanism of injury and were included. Of those, 89% were male, median age was 28 years, and 330 (18%) were offered NOM. Compared to IO, NOM patients were less likely to have gunshot wound (59% vs 89% p < 0.001) or high-grade renal injuries [AAST 4-5] (48% vs 76%, p < 0.001). Lower rates of in-hospital complications and shorter ICU and hospital stays were observed in the NOM group. NOM failed in 26 patients (8%). Independent predictors of NOM failure included a concomitant abdominal injury (OR = 3.99, 95% CI 1.03-23.23, p = 0.044), and every point increase in AAST grade (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.27-5.21, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS: NOM is highly successful in selected patients. Concomitant abdominal injuries and higher grade AAST injuries predict NOM failure and should be considered when selecting patients for IO or NOM.

Original languageEnglish
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)32-38
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Research areas

  • Injury, Kidney, Management, Nonoperative, Penetrating, Renal, Trauma

ID: 58123539