Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Consequences for preoperative pain and function when postponing elective knee and hip arthroplasty

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  1. Patient costs and patient flow after implementation of S100B in Scandinavian head trauma guidelines

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  2. Introducing video calls in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 lockdown: a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  3. Drug use in patients with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  4. Prevalence and duration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  5. Simulation-based surgical training needs in otorhinolaryngology

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus outbreak causes postponement of elective surgery. We evaluated how pain, function and general health were impacted by postponing elective knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis with no known surgery rescheduling date due to the coronavirus outbreak.

METHODS: This study included 194 patients from a Danish public hospital with postponed elective primary knee or hip arthroplasty due to the lockdown. Patients responded to questionnaires when their surgery was cancelled and before surgery. Changes in pain and function were evaluated with the Oxford Knee and Hip Scores (OKS, OHS) and their general health with the EuroQol 5-dimension scale (EQ5D). Additionally, we asked about the patients' concerns and whether they felt improved, unchanged or deteriorated during the waiting period.

RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 110 (57%) patients, 59 and 51 awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty (median age 71 years, 62% were female), respectively. Arthroplasty was postponed for a median (range) 98 (63-161) days. A total of 34% were concerned that the postponement would lead to a poorer outcome. Mean OKS and OHS differences were 0 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1-1) and -1 (95% CI: -2-0) from surgery cancellation to re-scheduled surgery. The mean EQ5D index difference was 0.0 (95% CI: 0.0-0.1) for both groups. A total of 75 (68%) patients felt an important deterioration of their condition.

CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operatively, patients worried about experiencing an altered treatment outcome due to postponed surgery and felt that their condition had deteriorated during the waiting period although this was not reflected in patient-reported outcome measures.

FUNDING: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA06210509
JournalDanish Medical Journal
Volume69
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
ISSN1603-9629
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2022

Bibliographical note

Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

    Research areas

  • Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Female, Humans, Male, Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery, Pain, Patient Reported Outcome Measures

ID: 78454367