Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Conceptualization, operationalization, and content validity of the EQOL-questionnaire measuring quality of life and participation for persons with disabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Family involvement in the care of preteens with type 1 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

  2. Trends in social inequality in loneliness among adolescents 1991-2014

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Living with a disability: a qualitative study of associations between social relations, social participation and quality of life

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Diverse disabilities: measuring quality of life and participation

    Research output: Other contributionResearch

  5. Advanced paternal age and mortality of offspring under 5 years of age: a register-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Measurement of quality of life demands thoroughly developed and validated instruments. The development steps from theory to concepts and from empirical data to items are sparsely described in the literature of questionnaire development. Furthermore, there seems to be a need for an instrument measuring quality of life and participation in a population with diverse disabilities. The aim of this paper was to present and discuss the initial steps in the development of the Electronic Quality of Life questionnaire (EQOL).

METHODS: The development of EQOL included six steps: 1) Establishing conceptual understanding; 2) Development of interview guides which build on the conceptual understanding; 3) Qualitative interviews of 55 participants (10-40 years old) with different types and severities of disabilities; 4) Conceptualization of domains identified in the qualitative data through thematic analysis; 5) Operationalization of the identified domains into items and; 6) Evaluation of content validity of the first version of the EQOL-measure. Content validity was examined by cognitive interviews with participants in the target group as well as by continuous feedback from an advisory board.

RESULTS: We identified six domains (function and health, environment (physical and social), social network, wellbeing, occupation, and managing strategies) based on themes derived from the qualitative interviews and on conceptual discussions within the author group. These domains were incorporated in a conceptual model and items were generated to measure the content of each domain. Participants expressed satisfaction with EQOL but most participants felt that there were too many items.

CONCLUSIONS: In total, 191 items were included in the questionnaire. Participants felt that the EQOL-questionnaire was relevant to their quality of life and participation. We have shown that it is possible to include quality of life and participation for people with various disabilities in one instrument. Although capturing less detail than a condition specific instrument, EQOL includes aspects perceived important for people with disabilities who are not included in general surveys. This is relevant when for example evaluating environmental adaptations and when comparing populations with various disabilities.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume16
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)199
ISSN1477-7525
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Adult, Child, Disabled Persons/psychology, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life/psychology, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Social Support, Surveys and Questionnaires/standards, Young Adult

ID: 57500914