Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Compensatory mechanisms activated with intermittent energy restriction: A randomized control trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Gastric cancer and gastrin: on the interaction of Helicobacter pylori gastritis and acid inhibitory induced hypergastrinemia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Investigating the effect of sex and ketosis on weight-loss-induced changes in appetite

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Fructose malabsorption induces cholecystokinin expression in the ileum and cecum by changing microbiota composition and metabolism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Opinion: Stop gaming peer review

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateCommunication

  • Sílvia Ribeiro Coutinho
  • Eline Holli Halset
  • Sigrid Gåsbakk
  • Jens F Rehfeld
  • Bård Kulseng
  • Helen Truby
  • Cátia Martins
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Strong compensatory responses, with reduced resting metabolic rate (RMR), increased exercise efficiency (ExEff) and appetite, are activated when weight loss (WL) is achieved with continuous energy restriction (CER), which try to restore energy balance. Intermittent energy restriction (IER), where short spells of energy restriction are interspaced by periods of habitual energy intake, may offer some protection in minimizing those responses. We aimed to compare the effect of IER versus CER on body composition and the compensatory responses induced by WL.

METHODS: 35 adults (age: 39 ± 9 y) with obesity (BMI: 36 ± 4 kg/m(2)) were randomized to lose a similar weight with an IER (N = 18) or a CER (N = 17) diet over a 12 week period. Macronutrient composition and overall energy restriction (33% reduction) were similar between groups. Body weight/composition, RMR, fasting respiratory quotient (RQ), ExEff (10, 25, and 50 W), subjective appetite ratings (hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption (PFC)), and appetite-regulating hormones (active ghrelin (AG), cholecystokinin (CCK), total peptide YY (PYY), active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and insulin) were measured before and after WL.

RESULTS: Changes in body weight (≈12.5% WL) and composition were similar in both groups. Fasting RQ and ExEff at 10 W increased in both groups. Losing weight, either by IER or CER dieting, did not induce significant changes in subjective appetite ratings. RMR decreased and ExEff at 25 and 50 W increased (P < 0.001 for all) in IER group only. Basal and postprandial AG increased (P < 0.05) in IER group, whereas basal active GLP-1 decreased (P = 0.033) in CER group only. Postprandial CCK decreased in both groups (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.009 for IER and CER groups, respectively). No between group differences were apparent for any of the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: The technique used to achieve energy restriction, whether it is continuous or intermittent, does not appear to modulate the compensatory mechanisms activated by weight loss.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02169778 (the study was registered in clinicaltrial.gov).

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Volume37
Pages (from-to)815-823
Number of pages9
ISSN0261-5614
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52055043