Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparison of the Outcomes of Individuals With Medically Attended Influenza A and B Virus Infections Enrolled in 2 International Cohort Studies Over a 6-Year Period: 2009-2015

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in Denmark From 2009 to 2014; Characteristics and Predictors for Treatment Outcome

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Diagnostic Performance of T2Candida Among ICU Patients With Risk Factors for Invasive Candidiasis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. How to RESPOND to Modern Challenges for People Living with HIV: A Profile for a New Cohort Consortium

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Compassionate Use of Remdesivir in Covid-19

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  3. Interstitial lung abnormalities in people with HIV infection and uninfected controls

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Dominic E Dwyer
  • Ruth Lynfield
  • Marcelo H Losso
  • Richard T Davey
  • Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri
  • Deborah Wentworth
  • Timothy M Uyeki
  • Fred Gordin
  • Brian Angus
  • Tavs Qvist
  • Sean Emery
  • Jens Lundgren
  • James D Neaton
  • INSIGHT Influenza Study Group
View graph of relations

Background: Outcome data from prospective follow-up studies comparing infections with different influenza virus types/subtypes are limited.

Methods: Demographic, clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes for adults with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), or B virus infections were compared in 2 prospective cohorts enrolled globally from 2009 through 2015. Logistic regression was used to compare outcomes among influenza virus type/subtypes.

Results: Of 3952 outpatients, 1290 (32.6%) had A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection, 1857 (47.0%) had A(H3N2), and 805 (20.4%) had influenza B. Of 1398 inpatients, 641 (45.8%) had A(H1N1)pdm09, 532 (38.1%) had A(H3N2), and 225 (16.1%) had influenza B. Outpatients with A(H1N1)pdm09 were younger with fewer comorbidities and were more likely to be hospitalized during the 14-day follow-up (3.3%) than influenza B (2.2%) or A(H3N2) (0.7%; P < .0001). Hospitalized patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 (20.3%) were more likely to be enrolled from intensive care units (ICUs) than those with A(H3N2) (11.3%) or B (9.8%; P < .0001). However, 60-day follow-up of discharged inpatients showed no difference in disease progression (P = .32) or all-cause mortality (P = .30) among influenza types/subtypes. These findings were consistent after covariate adjustment, in sensitivity analyses, and for subgroups defined by age, enrollment location, and comorbidities.

Conclusions: Outpatients infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 or influenza B were more likely to be hospitalized than those with A(H3N2). Hospitalized patients infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 were younger and more likely to have severe disease at study entry (measured by ICU enrollment), but did not have worse 60-day outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOpen Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume4
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)ofx212
ISSN2328-8957
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52584947