Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Risk of incarceration in children with inguinal hernia: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Dealing with the round ligament of uterus in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a nationwide survey among experienced surgeons

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Open ventral hernia repair with a composite ventral patch - final results of a multicenter prospective study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Large Incisional Hernias Increase in Size

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Anastomotic Leakage After Stoma Reversal Combined with Incisional Hernia Repair

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • I Kyle-Leinhase
  • F Köckerling
  • L N Jørgensen
  • A Montgomery
  • J F Gillion
  • J A P Rodriguez
  • W Hope
  • F Muysoms
View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the international CORE project was to explore the databases of the existing hernia registries and compare them in content and outcome variables.

METHODS: The CORE project was initiated with representatives from all established hernia registries (Danish Hernia Database, Swedish Hernia Registry, Herniamed, EuraHS, Club Hernie, EVEREG, AHSQC) in March 2015 in Berlin. The following categories were used to compare the registries: initiation and funding, data collection and use for certification of hernia centers, patient data and data protection, operative data, registration of complications and follow-up data.

RESULTS: The Danish Hernia Database is the only one to qualify as a genuine national registry where participation is compulsory for entry of all procedures by all surgeons performing a hernia operation. All other registries have to be considered as voluntary and completeness of data depends upon the participating hospitals and surgeons. Only the Danish Hernia Database and the Swedish Hernia Registry are publicly funded. All other registries are reliant on financial support from the medical technology industry. As an incentive for voluntary participation in a hernia registry, hospitals or surgeons are issued a certificate confirming that they are taking part in a quality assurance study for hernia surgery. Due to data protection and privacy regulations, most registries are obliged or have chosen to enter their patient data anonymously or coded. The Danish Hernia Database and Swedish Hernia Registry utilize a national personal patient code. In the Herniamed Registry, patient data are saved in a coded and anonymous format after obtaining the patient's informed consent.

CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the way data are collected for each of the listed hernia registries, the data are indispensable in clinical research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
Volume22
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)561-575
Number of pages15
ISSN1265-4906
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

ID: 55452287