Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparison of Frame-Based Versus Frameless Intracranial Stereotactic Biopsy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  1. Dural Arteriovenous Fistula of the Vein of Trolard Mimicking a Cavernous Sinus Fistula

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Biopsy and Ablation of H3K27 Glioma Using Skull-Mounted Smartframe Device: Technical Case Report

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Deciding on Appropriate Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring System

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Long-Term Follow-Up and Predictors of Functional Outcome after Surgery for Spinal Meningiomas: A Population-Based Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Risk factors for need of reoperation in bilateral chronic subdural haematomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for functional impairment after intracranial tumor surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Impact of meningioma surgery on use of antiepileptic, antidepressant, and sedative drugs: A Swedish nationwide matched cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. TERT promoter mutations in primary and secondary WHO grade III meningioma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Sanjay Dhawan
  • Yuyu He
  • Jiri Bartek
  • Ali A Alattar
  • Clark C Chen
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Frame-based stereotaxy has generally been considered the reference standard for brain biopsies. However, frameless stereotaxy might expedite the efficiency of the clinical work flow. Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the relative efficacy and safety of frame-based and frameless needle biopsy of brain lesions. We performed a meta-analysis of the reported data to compare the relative efficacy, safety, and time efficiency of frame-based and frameless stereotactic needle biopsy.

METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for studies comparing frame-based and frameless biopsy. Of the 5248 reports found, 15 were included in the present meta-analysis.

RESULTS: The 15 studies included in the present meta-analysis included 2400 patients. Our analysis found no statistically significant differences between frame-based and frameless biopsy in the diagnostic yield (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.41), morbidity (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.76-1.66), mortality (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.40-2.17), postbiopsy hemorrhage (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.68-1.96), and postbiopsy neurological deficit (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-1.65). The results from our integrated analysis indicated that frameless biopsies are associated with a shorter procedural time relative to frame-based biopsy (standard difference in the mean, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.24-1.04; P = 0.002; I2 [Higgins inconsistency index] = 86.66%).

CONCLUSIONS: The results from our meta-analysis suggest no significant differences exist between frame-based and frameless biopsy in diagnostic yield, morbidity, and mortality. Frameless biopsy is associated with shorter procedural times relative to frame-based biopsy. We have also discussed the relative merits of frame-based and frameless biopsies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume127
Pages (from-to)607-616.e4
ISSN1878-8750
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

ID: 58984928