TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of four patient reported outcome measures in patients with ankle fracture
T2 - A study on patient preferences and psychometric properties
AU - Gundtoft, Per Hviid
AU - Erichsen, Julie Ladeby
AU - Terndrup, Mads
AU - Walsøe, Lauritz
AU - Pedersen, Lasse
AU - Viberg, Bjarke
AU - Ørts, Alice
AU - Abrahamsen, Charlotte
N1 - Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/7/14
Y1 - 2024/7/14
N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess psychometric properties of Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS), the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in adults with ankle fractures.METHODS: Patients received all four questionnaires 6, 12, 14, 24, 52, and 104 weeks following an ankle fracture. According to COSMIN guidelines, statistical tests were performed to assess floor- and ceiling effects, structural validity, construct validity and reliability. Cognitive interview was performed with 9 patients.RESULTS: MOXFQ showed best model fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. When testing construct validity, all hypotheses were accepted except for OMAS and FJS. All questionnaires had an almost perfect test-retest reliability (Interclass Correlation Coefficient 0.81 to 0.91) and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.76 to 0.95. MOXFQ was the best rated questionnaire.CONCLUSION: All questionnaires performed well and we recommend MOXFQ for future use in ankle fracture studies.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
AB - BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess psychometric properties of Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS), the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in adults with ankle fractures.METHODS: Patients received all four questionnaires 6, 12, 14, 24, 52, and 104 weeks following an ankle fracture. According to COSMIN guidelines, statistical tests were performed to assess floor- and ceiling effects, structural validity, construct validity and reliability. Cognitive interview was performed with 9 patients.RESULTS: MOXFQ showed best model fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. When testing construct validity, all hypotheses were accepted except for OMAS and FJS. All questionnaires had an almost perfect test-retest reliability (Interclass Correlation Coefficient 0.81 to 0.91) and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.76 to 0.95. MOXFQ was the best rated questionnaire.CONCLUSION: All questionnaires performed well and we recommend MOXFQ for future use in ankle fracture studies.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198387835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fas.2024.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.fas.2024.07.001
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39013738
SN - 1268-7731
JO - Foot and Ankle Surgery
JF - Foot and Ankle Surgery
ER -