Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Comparing the patients' subjective experiences of acute side effects during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer with four different patient-reported outcomes questionnaires

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Meet the Acta Oncologica editorial board

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Incidence and survival of hypopharyngeal cancer: a Danish Nation-Wide Study from 1980 to 2014

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. NTCP model validation method for DAHANCA patient selection of protons versus photons in head and neck cancer radiotherapy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Improving the prognosis for lung cancer patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The systematic use of a Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) as symptom monitoring during cancer treatment and follow-up has the potential to increase symptom awareness, secure timely management of side effects, improve health-related quality of life and improve data quality. This study was conducted to identify the patients' experience during chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) and to investigate how these symptoms correspond with different PRO questionnaires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews on acute side effects were performed until saturation with HNSCC patients treated with high-dose radiotherapy (RT) ± concomitant chemotherapy. The symptoms were thematically grouped in organ classes in accordance with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). PRO questionnaires validated for patients with HNSCC during RT were identified in the literature and were compared to the patients' symptoms.

RESULTS: Thirteen patients were interviewed. The most frequently mentioned symptoms were oral pain, decreased appetite, dysphagia, dry mouth, fatigue and hoarseness, in order of frequency. A comparison between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Head and Neck Cancer (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General and Head and Neck (FACT-H&N), the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck questionnaire (MDASI-HN), selected items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and the symptoms described by the patients showed that the PROs do not cover the same symptoms, and no specific questionnaire covers all patient's experiences.

CONCLUSION: We find, that questionnaires applied in the field of PRO among patients with HNSCC undergoing RT may not fully comprise the experiences of patients and we recommend, that experiences of patients must be included in the design of trials involving PRO, in order to decrease the likelihood of missing out reports of acute side effects.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
ISSN0284-186X
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Jan 2019

ID: 56983933