Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparable effects of exercise and analgesics for pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of trials included in Cochrane systematic reviews

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Costs of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Localization, distribution, and connectivity of neuropeptide Y in the human and porcine retinas - a comparative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Melanopsin expressing human retinal ganglion cells: Subtypes, distribution and intraretinal connectivity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Sex differences in the photoperiodic regulation of RF-Amide related peptide (RFRP) and its receptor GPR147 in the syrian hamster

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Adaptive Trial Designs in Rheumatology: Report from the OMERACT Special Interest Group

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. OMERACT Development of a Core Domain Set of Outcomes for Shared Decision-making Interventions

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIM: Evidence of comparative effectiveness of different treatment approaches is important for clinical decision-making, yet absent for most recommended treatments of knee osteoarthritis pain. The objective of this study was to estimate the comparative effectiveness of exercise versus orally administered analgesics for pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS: The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews was searched for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies comparing exercise or analgesics with a control group (placebo or usual care) and with pain as an outcome. Individual study estimates were identified and effect sizes were calculated from group differences. We combined study-level effects on pain with a random effects meta-analysis and compared effect sizes between exercise trials and trials with analgesic interventions.

RESULTS: We included six Cochrane reviews (four pharmacology, two exercise). From these, 54 trials were eligible (20 pharmacology, 34 exercise), with 9806 participants (5627 pharmacology, 4179 exercise). The pooled effect size of pharmacological pain interventions was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.23-0.59) and for exercise 0.46 standardized mean difference (95% CI: 0.34-0.59). There was no statistically significant difference between the two types of intervention (difference: 0.06 standardized mean difference [95% CI: -0.28-0.16; p = 0.61]).

CONCLUSION: This meta-epidemiological study provides indirect evidence that for knee osteoarthritis pain, the effects from exercise and from oral analgesics are comparable. These results may support shared decision-making where a patient for some reason is unable to exercise or who consider exercise as unviable and analgesics as a more feasible choice. PROSPERO registration: CRD42013006924.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Comparative Neurology
Volume5
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)417-31
Number of pages15
ISSN0021-9967
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 48268977