Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Colonoscopy adverse events: are we getting the full picture?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. 3D analysis of the myenteric plexus of the human bowel by X-ray phase-contrast tomography - a future method?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Pathophysiological-based treatments of complications of cirrhosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality Following Hospitalization for Pericarditis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Incidence of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock during corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Incidence of infective endocarditis during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Lasse Pedersen
  • Nina Sorensen
  • Karen Lindorff-Larsen
  • Charlotte Green Carlsen
  • Nina Wensel
  • Christian Torp-Pedersen
  • Inge Bernstein
View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy adverse events (AEs) are commonly underreported and standardised reporting is rarely used. We aimed to investigate AEs associated with colonoscopy in a real world setting, using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of AEs related to outpatient colonoscopies performed in the North Denmark Region from 2015 to 2018 identified AEs from readmission within eight days or death within 30 days of colonoscopy. AEs were investigated in electronic health records and categorised, attributed and graded according to the ASGE lexicon.

RESULTS: Of 49,445 colonoscopies performed, 1141 were potentially associated with AEs (23.07‰). Electronic health record review left 489 AEs attributed to colonoscopy (9.9‰); categorised as cardiovascular (0.65‰), pulmonary (0.36‰), thromboembolic (0.10‰), instrumental incl. perforations (0.99‰), bleeding (3.07‰), infection (0.87‰), drug reactions (0.04‰), pain (2.00‰), integument (damage to skin/bones) (0.34‰) and other (1.62‰) AEs. Ten (0.20‰) AEs were fatal, but only one was procedure related (perforation). All shearing force perforations occurred in the sigmoid colon. Most polypectomy perforations occurred in the caecum (60%).

CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy carries important procedure and non-procedure related risks. Non-procedure related AEs are likely underreported. Better attention to patients with pre-existing diseases and further colonoscopist training may lower AE rates. A standardised colonoscopy AE reporting system is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume55
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)979-987
Number of pages9
ISSN0036-5521
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 61016520