Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Cognitive remediation plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone for individuals at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: Results of the FOCUS randomised clinical trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Development of visual attention from age 7 to age 12 in children with familial high risk for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Altered self-recognition in schizophrenia - A reply to critics

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. Altered self-recognition in patients with schizophrenia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis have significant cognitive deficits that can impede functional recovery. Applying cognitive remediation (CR) before the onset of frank psychosis may improve the cognitive and functional prognosis of UHR individuals, however, little is known about the feasibility and efficacy of CR for this population.

METHODS: In this randomised, clinical trial 146 individuals at UHR for psychosis aged 18-40 years were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus cognitive remediation. The CR targeted neurocognitive and social cognitive remediation. Assessments were carried out at 6- and 12-months post baseline.

RESULTS: A total of 73 UHR individuals were assigned to TAU and 73 assigned to TAU + cognitive remediation. Compared to the control group, cognitive remediation did not result in significant improvement on the primary outcome; the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia composite score at 6-month follow-up (b = -0.125, 95%CI: -0.23 to 0.172, p = 0.41). Nor did the intervention improve secondary outcomes in clinical symptoms or functioning. Exploratory analyses found emotion recognition latencies to be significantly more reduced in the intervention group at 6-months. At 12-months, the intervention group exhibited significantly better performance on two measures of executive function and visual memory.

CONCLUSION: The 20-session treatment protocol was not well received in the UHR group, and unsurprisingly global measures did not improve. The benefit found in isolated neuro- and social cognitive measures after even a few sessions points to a potential for cognitive malleability if people can be engaged sufficiently to practice the skills. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02098408.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume224
Pages (from-to)151-158
Number of pages8
ISSN0920-9964
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

    Research areas

  • Clinical high risk, Cognitive rehabilitation, Cognitive remediation, Early intervention, Ultra-high risk

ID: 60812918