Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Clinicians' heuristic assessments of radiographs compared with Kellgren-Lawrence and Ahlbäck ordinal grading: An exploratory study of knee radiographs using paired comparisons

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Drug-related challenges following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. MRi of the knee compared to specialized radiography for measurements of articular cartilage height in knees with osteoarthritis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Patient-reported outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the basal joint of the thumb

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Objectives Ordinal scales provide means for communicating the severity of a condition, but they are affected by cognitive biases, they introduce statistical problems and they sacrifice resolution. Clinicians discern more details than contained in scales, for example, when assessing radiographs, but clinicians' distinctions are often based on experience-based rules of thumb, that is, heuristics. The objectives of this study are to compare clinicians' heuristic assessments to ordinal grading, to identify case elements that influence clinicians' judgements and to present a method for quantifying heuristic assessments. Design Clinicians were presented with 17 207 random pairs from a set of 1087 knee radiographs. For each pair, the radiograph with more severe osteoarthritis was selected. The Bradley-Terry model was used to calculate an osteoarthritis strength parameter for each radiograph. Similarly, strength parameters were determined for 12 morphological features with five additional features being considered either present or absent. All radiographs were also graded according to conventional ordinal systems (Kellgren-Lawrence and Ahlbäck). Relations between clinicians' judgements and (1) the heuristics-based osteoarthritis strength, (2) conventional ordinal systems and (3) morphological features were investigated. Results Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the Bradley-Terry model provided a good description of clinicians' assessments (area under the curve (AUC)=0.97, 95% CI 0.968 to 0.972). Morphological features (AUC=0.90, 95% CI 0.900 to 0.908) provided a superior description of clinicians' choices compared with conventional ordinal systems (AUC=0.88, 95% CI 0.878 to 0.887 and AUC=0.80, 95% CI 0.796 to 0.809) for Ahlbäck and Kellgren-Lawrence, respectively). The features most strongly associated with osteoarthritis strength were medial joint space width, flattening of the medial femoral and tibial condyles, medial osteophytes and alignment. Conclusions Heuristics-based assessments give a better distinction than conventional grading systems of knee osteoarthritis. The example presents a general approach to evaluate which features are part of experts' heuristics. The data suggest that experts discern more details than included in conventional ordinal grading systems. Quantitative heuristic assessments may replace ordinal scales.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere041793
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)e041793
ISSN2044-6055
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2021

    Research areas

  • Heuristics, Humans, Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging, Matched-Pair Analysis, Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging, Radiography, research methods, statistics &amp, radiology &amp, diagnostic radiology, imaging, knee, musculoskeletal disorders

ID: 66400052