Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Clinical validation of three-dimensional ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Mortality and complications after aortic bifurcated bypass procedures for chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Regarding "Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis despite optimal medical therapy"

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Sex differences in 30-day and 5-year outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the EUROSTAR study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Micro-lightguide spectrophotometry for tissue perfusion in ischemic limbs

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Carotid atherosclerosis markers and adverse cardiovascular events

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Versus Carotid Plaque Burden for Predicting Cardiovascular Risk

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. How vascular surgeons can learn ultrasound

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Cutdown Technique is Superior to Fascial Closure for Femoral Artery Access after Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) examination is a relatively new modality that can be used for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance, and may offer improved reproducibility over conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interoperator reproducibility of maximum anterior-to-posterior diameter by nonphysician ultrasound technicians in a typical vascular laboratory setting, on patients with infrarenal AAAs using 3D-US and 2D-US examination.

METHODS: A total of 134 consecutive patients with asymptomatic infrarenal AAAs were screened. Of the 134 patients, 28 (21%) were screen failures. From the remaining 106 patients, 3 (2.8%) had missing data and 13 (12.3%) had technically unacceptable image quality. As a result, 90 patients were included for final analysis. Ultrasound image acquisitions were performed during the single visit. The 2D-US images were evaluated at the time of examination by the respective ultrasound technicians who acquired them. All 3D-US images were evaluated offline by both ultrasound technicians after a wash-out period of at least 6 weeks.

RESULTS: Excellent interoperator reproducibility was observed for measuring maximum diameter using 3D-US (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97), and good agreement among ultrasound technicians (mean difference, -0.08 mm; limits of agreement, -3.17; 3.00 mm). When using 3D-US examination, 74 of the 90 patients (82%) were estimated within 2 mm of interoperator variability. Of 90 patients, 52 (58%) were estimated to be within the same variability by 2D-US examination. Estimating AAA diameter using 3D-US was superior to 2D-US with respect to interoperator reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS: Both 3D-US and 2D-US examination demonstrated good reproducibility among two vascular ultrasound technicians with superior agreement from 3D-US examination. The present results support the broader use of 3D-US in standard AAA surveillance programs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume71
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)180-188
Number of pages9
ISSN0741-5214
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

ID: 59374292